ENHANCING TRANSPARENCY AND ENGAGEMENT: THE ROLE OF E-GOVERNMENT INITIATIVES IN FOSTERING INCLUSIVE GOVERNANCE IN THE DIGITAL AGE
Downloads
Objective: This study investigates the transformative impact of e-government initiatives on transparency and public engagement, emphasizing their role in fostering inclusive governance in the digital era. Method: Employing a qualitative approach, the study synthesizes case examples and literature on ICT-enabled governance tools, including digital identity systems, participatory platforms, and AI analytics. Results: The findings reveal that e-government platforms significantly enhance transparency by providing real-time access to public data and facilitate inclusive participation through user-centered design and interactive forums. Successful implementations, such as Estonia’s digital identity, Rwanda’s Irembo, and South Korea’s participatory budgeting, demonstrate increased accountability and trust in public institutions. However, persistent challenges—such as digital inequality, institutional inertia, and cybersecurity risks—must be addressed. Novelty: This paper offers a comprehensive, comparative analysis of innovative e-government practices and argues for strategic, inclusive, and secure adoption pathways. By highlighting diverse global implementations and their outcomes, it contributes to a deeper understanding of how digital governance can reinforce democratic processes and inform future research focused on long-term effectiveness and scalability.
S. H. Bhuiyan, “Modernizing Bangladesh public administration through e-governance: Benefits and challenges,” Gov Inf Q, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 54–65, Jan. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2010.04.006.
O. S. Masue and I. L. Swai, “From state control to network governance of primary education in Tanzania: has local empowerment been attained?,” Journal of Public Administration and Governance, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 92, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.5296/jpag.v5i1.7169.
A. Kuljambekova, “Enhancing efficiency of human resources services in government agencies of Kazakhstan,” Public Policy Adm, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 644–649, 2013, doi: 10.13165/vpa-13-12-4-10.
D. A. K. Kiram, M. M. Kiram, J.-A. A. Hadjibun, and M. Taraji, “Data governance and privacy in Sulu, Philippines: building trust and ensuring accountability in digital public service delivery,” Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1952–1966, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.37275/oaijss.v8i1.283.
A. S. Sikder and C. Ladman, “Pathways to equitable digital access: bridging the digital divide in Australian indigenous communities through transformative information technology initiatives.: bridging the digital divide in Australian Indigenous Communities.,” International Journal of Imminent Science & Technology., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 36–47, May 2008, doi: 10.70774/ijist.v1i1.11.
R. de S. Correia, “Information security as digital economy critical success factor: a military approach,” in Digital Transformation and Challenges to Data Security and Privacy, IGI Global, 2021, pp. 209–221. doi: 10.4018/978-1-7998-4201-9.ch012.
S. Mayne, “We hear you! case studies in authentic civic engagement from the city of Melbourne,” in Opening Government: Transparency and Engagement in the Information Age, ANU Press, 2018, pp. 115–122. doi: 10.22459/og.04.2018.10.
C. Galíndez-Hernández and E. Velasco-Sánchez, “E-Government for transparency in mexico: advances and limits in promoting open government and citizen engagement,” in E-Governance and Civic Engagement, IGI Global, 2012, pp. 48–71. doi: 10.4018/978-1-61350-083-5.ch003.
E. S. Rempel, J. Barnett, and H. Durrant, “Public engagement with UK government data science: propositions from a literature review of public engagement on new technologies,” Gov Inf Q, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 569–578, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2018.08.002.
F. G. Aleu and J. A. Garza-Reyes, “Critical success factors for continuous improvement projects,” in Leading Continuous Improvement Projects, Productivity Press, 2020, pp. 103–114. doi: 10.4324/9780429295775-7.
A. Mitra and V. Jain, “Evaluating the role of public-private partnerships in achieving sustainable development goals: a comparative study of government-led initiatives in developed and developing nations,” in Governance Strategies for Effective Sustainable Development, IGI Global, 2024, pp. 261–284. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-3011-1.ch013.
C.-H. Lin and T.-Y. Liu, “The webmosphirics effects on shopping behavior: the influences of web page color displays on online impulse purchasing intention,” Journal of Business and Economics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 24–32, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.15341/jbe(2155-7950)/01.10.2019/003.
C. Cappelli and F. Bernardini, “Session details: proactive transparency and knowledge discovery from open government data,” in Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age, in dg.o ’18. ACM, May 2018. doi: 10.1145/3247789.
A. B. de Luna and O. Kolotouchkina, “Smart place making through digital communication and citizen engagement: London and Madrid,” in Digital Government and Achieving E-Public Participation, IGI Global, 2020, pp. 206–228. doi: 10.4018/978-1-7998-1526-6.ch010.
T. M. Martinez, “Combating corruption through transparency: how have e-government investments affected levels of accountability in Brazil?,” in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, in ICEGOV2014. ACM, Oct. 2014, pp. 528–531. doi: 10.1145/2691195.2691271.
A. Misra, D. P. Misra, S. S. Mahapatra, and S. Biswas, “Digital transformation model: analytic approach on participatory governance & community engagement in India,” in Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age, in dg.o ’18. ACM, May 2018, pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1145/3209281.3209359.
Copyright (c) 2025 Rachata Chuangkrai
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
